It has been said that there are two things you should never watch while they are being made: one is sausage, and the other is tax law. Historically, this has been especially true of the rules and regulations governing the distributions from retirement funds, whether Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) or defined contribution plans (think 401k). For simplicity's sake, I am referring to both when I refer to Retirement Plans (RPs). Why does the IRS have such an interest in your retirement distribution planning? In the words of famous bank robber Willie Sutton, "That's where the money is." A lot of it, too!
In fact, according to the Investment Company Institute, some $15.5 trillion was held in RPs at the end of the first quarter of 2017 alone.
The fundamental purpose of any retirement distribution planning is to help taxpayers send some of today’s dollars ahead for tomorrow’s retirement. Interestingly, however, RPs were never intended as financial vehicles to build large estates for heirs. This has been a nice “unintended consequence” for taxpayers and their progeny. (And the IRS is none too happy about that.)
To facilitate their fundamental purpose of encouraging you to send money ahead for your own retirement (so you will not need to rely on Social Security alone), RPs enjoy preferential tax treatment during their creation and as they accumulate until distribution. They are created with pre-tax dollars and then grow tax-deferred. Consequently, through the tax-deferred compounding of their interest and dividends each year, RPs often grow to produce rather impressive account balances.
In fact, according to urban legend, Albert Einstein declared that “compound interest is the most powerful force in the universe.” Regardless of whether he actually said that, the fact remains: Especially in a tax-deferred environment, compound interest is quite a wonder.
Because of their preferential tax treatment on the front end (and while compounding tax-deferred), all distributions from RPs are fully taxed as ordinary income. Here is where taxpayers and the IRS have competing goals.
Taxpayers want to delay distributions from their RPs and enjoy the tax-deferred compounding as long as possible. Conversely, the IRS wants to see taxpayers take distributions faster and thus pay more taxes on the distributions at ordinary income rates.
Unfortunately, the IRS writes the rules and regulations.
As with everything it touches, the IRS seeks to control taxpayer behavior through a system of carrots and sticks. Carrots to reward and sticks to punish. During your working years, you are given the IRS carrot of pre-tax contributions (often with an employer contribution to boot) to your RP. After that, your RP enjoys another IRS carrot as it grows exponentially by compounding in a tax-deferred environment. [Ergo, the insightful observation noted above attributed to Albert Einstein.]
So much for the carrots; now for the sticks.
Here is a little "grammar school" on two sticks the IRS holds to keep you in check regarding your retirement distribution planning. Remember these sticks as: 1) too soon, and 2) too late and/or too little. A basic understanding of these two sticks concepts is essential to avoid avoidable IRS penalties regarding RP distributions.
First, absent very limited exceptions, any distribution you take from your RP before age 59½ will subject you to a 10% excise tax in addition to the tax on the distribution itself.
Ouch!
Teaching point: You cannot access your RP too soon.
The funds are intended for your retirement later, not a new bass boat now.
Second, without exception, you must begin taking Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) no later than your Required Beginning Date (RBD). Every IRA owner has but one RBD. That date is December 31 of the calendar year following the year during which the IRA owner reaches age 73 (increasing to age 75 in 2033). After taking your RMD no later than your RBD, you must take subsequent RMDs by December 31 every year after that.
The penalty for non-compliance is stiff.
The RP owner must pay not only income taxes on the full amount that their RBD should have distributed but also an additional excise tax of 25% on the RMD amount that should have been distributed but was not. And the 25% excise tax applies in any year in which at least the required RMD was not taken.
Ouch!
The RMDs are the minimum distributions an IRA owner must take each year according to an annual calculation. How are RMDs calculated for the retirement plan owner? It's a surprisingly simple calculation.
The IRA balance as of December 31 of each year is divided by the remaining life expectancy factor of the RP owner for the following year. The resulting amount must be distributed … at a minimum over the next year.
Every RP owner uses the Uniform Life table to recalculate their RMD each year. An exception is an RP owner with a spouse over ten years younger. Such an RP owner may elect to use either the Uniform Life table or the IRS Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy table, which is more favorable.
Teaching Point: Start your distributions when required and withdraw at least what is required annually after that.
While the IRA owner is alive and “retired” (however they define it), the focus is on retirement distributions. As discussed above, you must take at least the RMD yearly or pay the penalty. But what if more money is left in your RP after you are gone and your spouse, if any, is gone? What then?
You likely worked hard for many years to earn and grow your RP. Wouldn’t it be a shame to have those who inherit your RP squander it on depreciating consumer goods and fleeting “experiences”? Let’s face it – your hard-earned RP could be blown in the proverbial “New York minute” without very, very careful planning.
The calculus on how your non-spousal beneficiaries must draw down your RP eliminates the potential for a “stretch” over the life expectancies of those beneficiaries.
For a bit of historical context, let’s review “how things used to be” before January 1, 2020, by comparing the difference between your beneficiary taking only RMDs each year and “cashing out” upfront.
For purposes of illustration, we will assume the following facts:
Prodigal withdraws the entire RP in the first year. That is a big day for the IRS, as it inherits 36% of the $500,000. After 30 years, having paid the upfront tax hit and then investing the net after-tax amount (i.e., suspending reality because he really “invested” it all on wine, women, and song), Prodigal would have $1,517,000 in year 30.
On the other hand, Responsible withdraws only the RMD each year using the life expectancy payout method. After 30 years, Responsible would have $1,696,000 remaining inside the RP and after-tax investments of $1,432,000 outside the RP in year 30. That is huge!
Consequently, absent a true emergency, it is only prudent to arrange for your beneficiaries to withdraw only the annual RMD. But how do you do that?
With limited exceptions after January 1, 2020, your non-spousal beneficiaries must drain their share of your RP entirely within five to 10 years! Yes, Virginia, the “stretch” is gone.
Many RP owners name their children as the direct beneficiaries. While this approach may work just fine and allow each beneficiary to “stretch” RMDs over their respective lifetimes, two hidden dangers are awaiting the unwary: 1) the beneficiary could “cash out” the RP like Prodigal, or 2) the beneficiary could have it “taken away” by creditors and predators based on the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Clark v. Rameker, 573 U.S. 122 (2014).
After the Clark decision, any inherited RP is fair game for the creditors and predators of a beneficiary unless protected by a state exemption statute. Think of divorces, lawsuits, and bankruptcies when you think of the typical creditors and predators.
When RP owners realize the risks inherent in designating adult children as direct beneficiaries, many designate their living trust or the testamentary trust under their last will as the direct beneficiary. I think the IRS realizes this is a common alternative. As a result, the rules governing when a “trust” qualifies as a “designated beneficiary” on behalf of the “trust beneficiaries” are some of the most tortured in the entire tax code. Bar none.
Remember my “sausages and tax law” analogy? Case in point.
Knowing that responsible taxpayers will try to protect their RPs from and for their children, the IRS makes it extremely difficult for those taxpayers to provide for the maximum “stretch” when a “trust” created under a living trust or last will is the beneficiary of choice.
If you find all of this confusing, then you are not alone.
It is.
When accumulating your RP and withdrawing from it in retirement, you work closely with your financial advisor to ensure the best strategy to maximize your overall return and minimize your overall tax bill. At the same time, make sure you have an estate planning strategy for the eventual inheritance of your RP.
Depending on each unique client situation, we may recommend designating adult children as the direct beneficiaries, designating trusts created under a living trust or a last will, or creating state-of-the-art “stand-alone IRA inheritance trusts” for each beneficiary (even for each grandchild, in some circumstances).
Teaching Point: The estate planning for your RP should be as carefully considered as the rest of your estate plan.
There is simply too much at stake.
This has been a brief overview of retirement distribution planning. Remember: Take no action without consulting qualified legal counsel. The appropriate application of relevant laws will vary depending on the unique facts presented.
There are three ways to schedule your consultation: first, give us a call; second, send us an email; or third, Request an Initial Consultation/Review online. It is that easy. Really.
AV® Preeminent™ and BV® Distinguished™ are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies.
Mary D. CushingFebruary 12, 2024Highly recommend the people and services in this law firm.Anita FinnJanuary 25, 2024Kyle was patient and thorough. He was able to explain the legal concepts in an easy to understand manner.Susan HerwigJanuary 19, 2024I am a 2nd generation family member to use the Law Office of Kyle Krull , PA and I couldn’t be happier with my experience and estate plan!Kathleen DeMunckJanuary 17, 2024Our two meetings and communications with Kyle and Gretchen Krull were excellent. They are knowledgeable, able to explain the difficult concepts of Estate Planning and have thought of every detail needed to make one comfortable with the end result. Their patience with my many questions was extraordinary. We especially appreciated their connection to us. They are people who care.Kate EsquivelJanuary 17, 2024Highest of ratings! We had met with a few firms to finalize our estate and knew immediately upon meeting these two this would be it. Explained everything to our understanding, gave us guidance, and never felt rushed or sold! Recommending them to everyone I know!Gary WellsJanuary 10, 2024Kyle has been our Estate Planning Attorney for the last 12 years. During this time he has listened carefully to our wishes, asked thoughtful questions, and created plans that exceeded our expectations. Highly recommend!Merideth RoseNovember 16, 2023My mother and I cannot speak highly enough about our experience with Kyle and Gretchen Krull. Having conducted extensive research on estate planning attorneys best suited to support my mother in updating her revocable living trust, health directives and other estate planning documents, we were first drawn to Kyle and Gretchen due to the plethora of positive reviews we found in conjunction with their services. Having completed the process and now with current and finalized documents, we can attest to the quality, attention, great sensitivity and trauma-informed personal touch Kyle and Gretchen provide. Assisting my mother who is of age and at times found this process to be a bit daunting, Kyle approached my mother, her needs and the totality of her experience with great grace, patience and thoroughness. I like to believe he cared for my mother, only as I would and could. Our hearts and minds are now with great comfort in knowing her wishes for her personal and financial affairs have been adequately heard and prepared for. Indeed we are grateful to have met Kyle, and now to be considered as clients of the Krull family.Melinda EmigSeptember 20, 2023Kyle returned my call the same day to speak with my mom and me about her trust/estate status and gave my mom spot on advice/insight without charging my her. My mom has extremely limited vision, and a family member had taken documents from her trust/will out of her home without telling her. After our initial call, mom hired Kyle. He made sure all my mom’s PoA's, Addendums, etc. were in order, updated, and delivered to her within a few days. Kyle has vast knowledge in all estate planning, wills, and trust matters. His kindness and integrity were apparent from our first call and meeting. His staff is very professional (Gretchen is amazingly helpful and responsive). Kyle guides his clients through the trust/will/estate procedure with knowledge, insight and efficiency while taking great care of his clients which made the entire process easy!Pascal LutzSeptember 10, 2023My spouse and I had a great experience working with Kyle and Gretchen to get our estate planning organized. We felt we received good advise and that the process was smooth and efficient. We recommend Kyle and Gretchen without any hesitation.
REMEMBER: “The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.”
This statement is required by rule of the Supreme Court of Missouri.
